If you aren’t wowed by Python’s super() builtin, chances are you don’t really know what it is capable of doing or how to use it effectively.
Much has been written about super() and much of that writing has been a failure. This article seeks to improve on the situation by:
Using Python 3 syntax, let’s start with a basic use case, a subclass for extending a method from one of the builtin classes:
class LoggingDict(dict): def __setitem__(self, key, value): logging.info('Setting %r to %r' % (key, value)) super().__setitem__(key, value)
This class has all the same capabilities as its parent, dict, but it extends the __setitem__ method to make log entries whenever a key is updated. After making a log entry, the method uses super() to delegate the work for actually updating the dictionary with the key/value pair.
Before super() was introduced, we would have hardwired the call with dict.__setitem__(self, key, value). However, super() is better because it is a computed indirect reference.
One benefit of indirection is that we don’t have to specify the delegate class by name. If you edit the source code to switch the base class to some other mapping, the super() reference will automatically follow. You have a single source of truth:
class LoggingDict(SomeOtherMapping): # new base class def __setitem__(self, key, value): logging.info('Setting %r to %r' % (key, value)) super().__setitem__(key, value) # no change needed
In addition to isolating changes, there is another major benefit to computed indirection, one that may not be familiar to people coming from static languages. Since the indirection is computed at runtime, we have the freedom to influence the calculation so that the indirection will point to some other class.
The calculation depends on both the class where super is called and on the instance’s tree of ancestors. The first component, the class where super is called, is determined by the source code for that class. In our example, super() is called in the LoggingDict.__setitem__ method. That component is fixed. The second and more interesting component is variable (we can create new subclasses with a rich tree of ancestors).
Let’s use this to our advantage to construct a logging ordered dictionary without modifying our existing classes:
class LoggingOD(LoggingDict, collections.OrderedDict): pass
The ancestor tree for our new class is: LoggingOD, LoggingDict, OrderedDict, dict, object. For our purposes, the important result is that OrderedDict was inserted after LoggingDict and before dict! This means that the super() call in LoggingDict.__setitem__ now dispatches the key/value update to OrderedDict instead of dict.
Think about that for a moment. We did not alter the source code for LoggingDict. Instead we built a subclass whose only logic is to compose two existing classes and control their search order.
What I’ve been calling the search order or ancestor tree is officially known as the Method Resolution Order or MRO. It’s easy to view the MRO by printing the __mro__ attribute:
>>> pprint(LoggingOD.__mro__) (<class '__main__.LoggingOD'>, <class '__main__.LoggingDict'>, <class 'collections.OrderedDict'>, <class 'dict'>, <class 'object'>)
If our goal is to create a subclass with an MRO to our liking, we need to know how it is calculated. The basics are simple. The sequence includes the class, its base classes, and the base classes of those bases and so on until reaching object which is the root class of all classes. The sequence is ordered so that a class always appears before its parents, and if there are multiple parents, they keep the same order as the tuple of base classes.
The MRO shown above is the one order that follows from those constraints:
The process of solving those constraints is known as linearization. There are a number of good papers on the subject, but to create subclasses with an MRO to our liking, we only need to know the two constraints: children precede their parents and the order of appearance in __bases__ is respected.
super() is in the business of delegating method calls to some class in the instance’s ancestor tree. For reorderable method calls to work, the classes need to be designed cooperatively. This presents three easily solved practical issues:
1) Let’s first look at strategies for getting the caller’s arguments to match the signature of the called method. This is a little more challenging than traditional method calls where the callee is known in advance. With super(), the callee is not known at the time a class is written (because a subclass written later may introduce new classes into the MRO).
One approach is to stick with a fixed signature using positional arguments. This works well with methods like __setitem__ which have a fixed signature of two arguments, a key and a value. This technique is shown in the LoggingDict example where __setitem__ has the same signature in both LoggingDict and dict.
A more flexible approach is to have every method in the ancestor tree cooperatively designed to accept keyword arguments and a keyword-arguments dictionary, to remove any arguments that it needs, and to forward the remaining arguments using **kwds, eventually leaving the dictionary empty for the final call in the chain.
Each level strips-off the keyword arguments that it needs so that the final empty dict can be sent to a method that expects no arguments at all (for example, object.__init__ expects zero arguments):
class Shape: def __init__(self, shapename, **kwds): self.shapename = shapename super().__init__(**kwds) class ColoredShape(Shape): def __init__(self, color, **kwds): self.color = color super().__init__(**kwds) cs = ColoredShape(color='red', shapename='circle')
2) Having looked at strategies for getting the caller/callee argument patterns to match, let’s now look at how to make sure the target method exists.
The above example shows the simplest case. We know that object has an __init__ method and that object is always the last class in the MRO chain, so any sequence of calls to super().__init__ is guaranteed to end with a call to object.__init__ method. In other words, we’re guaranteed that the target of the super() call is guaranteed to exist and won’t fail with an AttributeError.
For cases where object doesn’t have the method of interest (a draw() method for example), we need to write a root class that is guaranteed to be called before object. The responsibility of the root class is simply to eat the method call without making a forwarding call using super().
Root.draw can also employ defensive programming using an assertion to ensure it isn’t masking some other draw() method later in the chain. This could happen if a subclass erroneously incorporates a class that has a draw() method but doesn’t inherit from Root.:
class Root: def draw(self): # the delegation chain stops here assert not hasattr(super(), 'draw') class Shape(Root): def __init__(self, shapename, **kwds): self.shapename = shapename super().__init__(**kwds) def draw(self): print('Drawing. Setting shape to:', self.shapename) super().draw() class ColoredShape(Shape): def __init__(self, color, **kwds): self.color = color super().__init__(**kwds) def draw(self): print('Drawing. Setting color to:', self.color) super().draw() cs = ColoredShape(color='blue', shapename='square') cs.draw()
If subclasses want to inject other classes into the MRO, those other classes also need to inherit from Root so that no path for calling draw() can reach object without having been stopped by Root.draw. This should be clearly documented so that someone writing new cooperating classes will know to subclass from Root. This restriction is not much different than Python’s own requirement that all new exceptions must inherit from BaseException.
3) The techniques shown above assure that super() calls a method that is known to exist and that the signature will be correct; however, we’re still relying on super() being called at each step so that the chain of delegation continues unbroken. This is easy to achieve if we’re designing the classes cooperatively – just add a super() call to every method in the chain.
The three techniques listed above provide the means to design cooperative classes that can be composed or reordered by subclasses.
How to Incorporate a Non-cooperative Class
Occasionally, a subclass may want to use cooperative multiple inheritance techniques with a third-party class that wasn’t designed for it (perhaps its method of interest doesn’t use super() or perhaps the class doesn’t inherit from the root class). This situation is easily remedied by creating an adapter class that plays by the rules.
For example, the following Moveable class does not make super() calls, and it has an __init__() signature that is incompatible with object.__init__, and it does not inherit from Root:
class Moveable: def __init__(self, x, y): self.x = x self.y = y def draw(self): print('Drawing at position:', self.x, self.y)
If we want to use this class with our cooperatively designed ColoredShape hierarchy, we need to make an adapter with the requisite super() calls:
class MoveableAdapter(Root): def __init__(self, x, y, **kwds): self.movable = Moveable(x, y) super().__init__(**kwds) def draw(self): self.movable.draw() super().draw() class MovableColoredShape(ColoredShape, MoveableAdapter): pass MovableColoredShape(color='red', shapename='triangle', x=10, y=20).draw()
Complete Example – Just for Fun
In Python 2.7 and 3.2, the collections module has both a Counter class and an OrderedDict class. Those classes are easily composed to make an OrderedCounter:
from collections import Counter, OrderedDict class OrderedCounter(Counter, OrderedDict): 'Counter that remembers the order elements are first seen' def __repr__(self): return '%s(%r)' % (self.__class__.__name__, OrderedDict(self)) def __reduce__(self): return self.__class__, (OrderedDict(self),) oc = OrderedCounter('abracadabra')
Notes and References
* When subclassing a builtin such as dict(), it is often necessary to override or extend multiple methods at a time. In the above examples, the __setitem__ extension isn’t used by other methods such as dict.update, so it may be necessary to extend those also. This requirement isn’t unique to super(); rather, it arises whenever builtins are subclassed.
* If a class relies on one parent class preceding another (for example, LoggingOD depends on LoggingDict coming before OrderedDict which comes before dict), it is easy to add assertions to validate and document the intended method resolution order:
position = LoggingOD.__mro__.index assert position(LoggingDict) < position(OrderedDict) assert position(OrderedDict) < position(dict)
* The Python 3 version of super() is used in this post. The full working source code can be found at: Recipe 577720. The Python 2 syntax differs in that the type and object arguments to super() are explicit rather than implicit. Also, the Python 2 version of super() only works with new-style classes (those that explicitly inherit from object or other builtin type). The full working source code using Python 2 syntax is at Recipe 577721.
Serveral Pythonistas did a pre-publication review of this article. Their comments helped improve it quite a bit.
They are: Laura Creighton, Alex Gaynor, Philip Jenvey, Brian Curtin, David Beazley, Chris Angelico, Jim Baker, Ethan Furman, and Michael Foord. Thanks one and all.